Mayra Alejandra Marcillo, Galo Alejandro Palacios


Developing our students’ English oral expression in Public Institutions is a process that needs to be carefully analyzed by teachers. It is more than selected a method, it is more than following step by step what a theory says. It is going beyond our students’ needs. It is a deeply study of what a student really can do and needs to learn. Based on a post-method pedagogy which provides teachers the ability to break down barriers to the imposition of a specific method and make the teaching process more effective, this paper proposes the application of the eclectic method for the development of the oral expression of public high school students encouraging teachers to see the teaching process from a different and modern perspective. By analyzing the principles and features of this method, this paper describes the research made on a Public Institution with students in third year. With the goal of improving each one of the principal components of the English oral expression: range, accuracy, fluency, pronunciation and coherence, there were used selected methods, techniques and strategies based upon the students’ learning styles and needs. The observation and Interview techniques were used on data collection and the parameters of Inferential and descriptive statistic were applied in order to analyze the results achieved. They showed that even though not all of the group of the students could achieve the B1 level in reference to the Common European Framework and required by the Ministry of Education, a large number of them were able to increase their English oral expression. According to this data, this paper concludes that the selection of objectives, the modern teacher‘s and student’s role, the use of different but selected methods, the linguistic input activation and the contextualization had a significant impact on learners´ learning.


post-method pedagogy; oral expression components; eclectic method learning styles

Full Text:



Beare, K. (2017). Principled Eclecticism. Retrieved from, 2017

Billah, M. (2015). Eclectic Approach to Teaching Language. Retrieved from 2016

Johnson, R. & Swain, M. (1997, Eds.) Immersion Education: International Perspectives. NY: Cambridge University Press.

Kolb, D. A. (1981). Learning styles and disciplinary differences. The modern American College, Vol. 18, 232-255

Kumaravadivelu, B. (2003) A postmethod perspective on English Language teaching. World Englishes, Vol. 22, 539-550

Larsen-Freeman, D & Anderson, M. (2011). Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

McLeod, S. A. (2013). Kolb - Learning Styles. Retrieved from learning-kolb.html. 2017

Real Academia Española. (2014). Diccionario de la lengua española [Dictionary of the Spanish Language] (23nd Ed.). Madrid, Spain: Author.

Richards J.C & Renandya W.(2002, Eds.). Methodology in Language Teaching: An Anthology of Current Practice (Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Salazar, L. & Batista, J. (2005). Hacia la Consolidación De Un Enfoque Ecléctico en la Enseñanza de Idiomas Extranjeros. Paradígma, 26(1), 55-88.

Vera. S (2014). Total Physical Response (TPR) Activities in Teaching

English To Young Learners.Retrieved from 2014. Introduction to Social Psychology. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2017 Mayra Alejandra Marcillo, Galo Alejandro Palacios

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

ONLINE ISSN: 2502-6909

PRINT ISSN: 2502-9207

Journal of English Education (JEE) is indexed at Google Scholar, PKP Index,  AcademicKeys, & Indonesian Publication Index (IPI - Portal Garuda).


shopify traffic stats View My Stats